Dissertation interviews are a common method of data collection in qualitative research. They offer in-depth insights into the experiences, opinions, and attitudes of participants. However, choosing the right type of interview—structured, semi-structured, or unstructured—can significantly impact the quality of the information you collect. Each interview type has its strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these will help you decide which best suits your research needs.
In this blog post, we’ll explore the three main types of dissertation interviews, their advantages, and disadvantages.
Structured interviews
Structured interviews follow a strict, pre-determined set of questions that are asked in the same order to every participant. There is no deviation from the script, and interviewers do not probe further or ask follow-up questions. Structured interviews are more common in quantitative research but can also be used in qualitative studies where consistency is key.
More Like This: Writing your dissertation limitations
Advantages
Consistency: Because every participant is asked the same set of questions, it’s easier to compare responses and identify patterns or trends across a larger sample.
Data reliability: The standardized format ensures that bias is minimized. Every participant is treated equally, which can improve the reliability of your findings.
Ease of analysis: The structured nature of the responses makes it easier to analyze the data, often enabling the use of statistical analysis methods, even in qualitative studies.
Time-efficient: These interviews are usually shorter, making them ideal for studies with a large number of participants or limited time.
Disadvantages
Limited depth: Since structured interviews don’t allow for deviation from the set questions, they may not capture the full range of a participant’s thoughts or emotions, limiting the richness of the data.
Rigid format: This rigidity can prevent interviewers from exploring interesting or unexpected topics that arise during the conversation, making the data less nuanced.
Participant frustration: Some participants may feel restricted by the format, unable to elaborate on points they find important, leading to less engaged responses.
Semi-structured interviews
Semi-structured interviews strike a balance between structure and flexibility. While there is a set of pre-determined questions or topics, interviewers can deviate from these questions, ask follow-up questions, and explore interesting points raised by the participant.
Advantages
Flexibility: The interviewer can adapt to the flow of the conversation, making it easier to probe for more detailed or meaningful responses based on the participant’s initial answers.
Depth of data: Since participants can elaborate on their answers, the data gathered from semi-structured interviews is often richer and more detailed.
Better rapport: The less formal nature of the conversation allows for a more natural dialogue, which can make participants feel more comfortable, leading to more honest and insightful answers.
Balance of comparability and depth: The pre-set questions allow for comparability between interviews, while the flexibility offers deeper exploration of key areas.
Disadvantages
Time-consuming: Since there is more flexibility, semi-structured interviews tend to take longer to conduct than structured interviews.
Inconsistent data: The freedom to deviate from the script can make it harder to compare responses between participants, as not everyone will be asked the exact same questions.
Difficult analysis: Analyzing data from semi-structured interviews can be complex, as the varied responses and level of detail can lead to a large, unstructured dataset that requires more careful and nuanced interpretation.
Unstructured interviews
Unstructured interviews are the most flexible form of interviewing. They have little to no predefined structure, allowing the conversation to flow naturally. The interviewer may have a general topic in mind but lets the participant guide the discussion. Unstructured interviews are common in exploratory research, where the goal is to gather as much rich, qualitative data as possible.
Advantages
Rich, in-depth data: Unstructured interviews allow participants to speak freely, leading to detailed, comprehensive insights into their experiences and opinions. This makes them particularly valuable for complex or sensitive topics.
Exploration of new ideas: Since the format is open-ended, interviewers can explore new ideas or topics that arise during the conversation, often revealing unexpected findings.
Strong rapport: The natural, conversational style of unstructured interviews can build a strong rapport with participants, helping them to feel more comfortable and open.
Disadvantages
Time-intensive: These interviews can take much longer to conduct, as they don’t have a clear beginning or end. The free-flowing nature of the conversation can make scheduling and execution more difficult.
Difficult to compare data: Because each interview can go in vastly different directions, it can be challenging to draw comparisons between participants or identify consistent themes.
Complex data analysis: The open-ended responses gathered from unstructured interviews often result in a large amount of unstructured data. Analyzing this data is more complex and time-consuming, requiring qualitative analysis methods such as thematic analysis.
Potential for bias: The lack of structure can lead to interviewer bias, where the interviewer may unconsciously influence the direction of the conversation.
Choosing the right type of interview for your dissertation
When deciding which type of interview to use in your dissertation, consider the following factors:
Research objective: If your goal is to gather standardized data for comparison, a structured interview might be the best choice. If you want to explore participants’ experiences in detail, a semi-structured or unstructured approach may be more suitable.
Time and resources: Structured interviews are faster to conduct and analyze, making them ideal if you have limited time or a large sample size. Semi-structured and unstructured interviews require more time and effort but can provide richer insights.
Research topic: For well-defined topics where you know what you need to ask, a structured or semi-structured interview is appropriate. For exploratory research or complex, sensitive subjects, an unstructured approach allows participants to express themselves more fully.
Participant comfort: Some participants may feel constrained by structured interviews, while others may appreciate the clarity and direction they provide. Unstructured interviews are often better suited to building rapport, especially on sensitive issues.
Follow us on X @BeInTheKnow_UK
