First Past the Post (FPTP) voting system

0

The United Kingdom uses the First Past the Post (FPTP) voting system for general elections, determining who represents each of the country’s 650 constituencies in the House of Commons. It’s a simple and straightforward method, but it also comes with significant advantages and disadvantages that influence the democratic process.

What is First Past the Post?

In the FPTP system, each constituency elects one Member of Parliament (MP) to represent them. Voters in each constituency cast a single vote for their preferred candidate. The candidate who receives the most votes in that constituency wins and becomes the MP for that area. The key point to note is that a candidate does not need to secure a majority of the votes—just more than any other candidate.

On election day, voters go to polling stations in their constituency, where they are given a ballot paper listing the names of the candidates standing for election. Voters mark an “X” next to the name of the candidate they prefer. Each voter is allowed to vote for only one candidate.

Once voting closes, the ballots are collected and counted. This process is usually completed within a few hours. In FPTP, it’s not the total number of votes across the country that matters, but rather the number of votes each candidate receives within their constituency.

The candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins the election in that constituency and becomes its MP. Importantly, this candidate does not need to win a majority (over 50%) of the votes—just more votes than any other candidate. This is why it’s called “First Past the Post”—the first candidate to get more votes than anyone else, like a race where the first to cross the finish line wins, regardless of how close others are.

For example, if a constituency has three candidates and they receive 40%, 35%, and 25% of the vote respectively, the candidate with 40% wins the seat, even though 60% of voters supported other candidates.

Advantages of First Past the Post

Simplicity and clarity: The FPTP system is straightforward, making it easy for voters to understand. They simply select one candidate, and the candidate with the most votes wins. This simplicity also speeds up the counting process, providing results quickly.

Strong and stable governments: FPTP often leads to a clear winner at the national level, with one party typically securing a majority of the seats in Parliament. This allows for the formation of strong, stable governments that can pass legislation and implement their policies without the need for coalition-building.

Local representation: Each MP represents a specific geographic area, meaning constituents have a direct link to their representative in Parliament. This enhances the sense of local accountability and ensures that regional issues can be addressed in the national legislature.

More Like This: Additional Member System in the UK

Disadvantages of First Past the Post

Disproportionate results: One of the main criticisms of FPTP is that it can produce disproportionate results, where the distribution of seats in Parliament does not accurately reflect the national vote share. A party can win a majority of seats with only a minority of the national vote, while other parties with significant support may be underrepresented.

Wasted votes: In many constituencies, votes for losing candidates are effectively “wasted” because they do not contribute to the election outcome. This can discourage voter participation, particularly in so-called “safe seats,” where one party is almost certain to win.

Two-Party dominance: FPTP often reinforces a two-party system, making it difficult for smaller parties to gain traction. Voters may feel pressured to vote tactically, choosing a less-preferred candidate from a major party to prevent their least-preferred candidate from winning, rather than voting for their true preference.

Regional disparities: The system can exacerbate regional disparities by over-representing certain areas or under-representing others. For example, a party might win many seats in one region with large margins, but struggle to win seats elsewhere, leading to an imbalance in representation.

Follow us on Twitter @BeInTheKnow_UK